Why we’ll be voting Labour again in this election

Not with any great enthusiasm, you understand. This isn’t 1997. There’s no sense of change or imminent renewal at this election; just resigned acceptance of four more years of the same (not withstanding the inevitable swap of Blair and Brown at some point). But nonetheless, it’s going to be Labour getting our vote again.

For several reasons.

Just picture the abject horror of waking up on May 6th (too old to stay up all night and watch the results come in now – not like in ’97) and discovering that Michael Howard, that odious arse-leech, and his band of nondescript political lightweights (truly, the term ‘shadow cabinet’ has never been more appropriate) are suddenly running the show. Imagine Howard’s smug, grinning, punchable face on the front page of all the newspapers and just feel the dread that would still arise from having the Tories back in power, eight years after the landslide that buried them. It doesn’t bear thinking about. Yes, it’s a sad reflection on our current political situation, but the fact remains: for all New Labour’s faults (and there are many), their principal advantage is still Not Being The Conservatives.

The Conservative Party has fought a bitter, nasty little campaign. Who can blame them? They need all the help they can get. Their continued attempt to make immigration the central issue was vile, as were the personal attacks. They were also hypocritical: trying to make political capital out of a war they backed and continue to back is duplicitous in the extreme. Luckily, most polls show that it is all backfiring. Come Friday morning, Michael Howard will be considering his position and his party will be right back where they started: rudderless, visionless and offering no real alternative for anybody.

Not that this is good for our democracy, which requires an effective opposition to operate properly. Blair has been spoiled for eight years with a massive majority and a weak and divided opposition. The ideal situation for this election would be for Labour to be returned with a majority, but nothing like the one they have enjoyed these last two terms. Perhaps one that would require working more closely with the Liberal Democrats, who have yet to convince anyone that they are ready to run a bath, let alone a country. (Charles Kennedy seems like a very nice bloke, and he’s probably a great laugh down the pub, but try and picture him at a sit-down with George Bush and Dick Cheney. You can’t, can you?) But a Labour government with a small Lib Dem coalition would be ideal. Labour’s authoritarian streak could be kept in check, Kennedy et al would get exposure to the actual running of government and the Tories would be relegated to Britain’s third party. Everybody wins.

The fact is, with the divisive issue of Iraq aside, Labour are still the only party worth voting for in 2005. At least, the only party who can actually form a government. Even if you hate Blair for Iraq, it’s not worth risking a Conservative government for it: they would have done exactly the same, perhaps even earlier. Instead focus on the facts: enormous increases, with more to come, for education and the health service. By 2008, when the spending peaks, we will actually be spending the same (or thereabouts) proportion of GDP on health-care as France and Germany. This is significant. Incredibly expensive, and it will result in inevitable tax rises some point soon, but significant all the same. Much can also be said about their handling of the economy. Handing interest rates decisions to the Bank Of England was a brilliant move and we have had eight years of continuous growth. Much of it has been serendipitous – a government can only take so much credit in a global economy – but Gordon Brown has been a very good Chancellor by anybody’s standards and will also, we suspect, make a very good Prime Minister. This is important, because in a way we are voting for him on Thursday.

So, Labour. Not perfect, by any means, but in the absence of a true alternative, there is nobody else deserving of our vote at this moment in time.

Advertisements

Centrist. Atlanticist. Dry liberal. Anti-totalitarian. Post-ideological pragmatist. Child of The Enlightenment. Toucan.

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Uncategorized
7 comments on “Why we’ll be voting Labour again in this election
  1. ph says:

    Gordon Brown, a good chancellor?.
    Here are some reasons why you should put the carefully constructed New labour narrative to one side and look at some facts.

    If it is a strong economy why is he borrowing 35 billion a year, God help us when the global economy slackens.

    He has presided over an economy whereby one of the fundamentals to life – a home, has become a privalege only the well off (and the Liberal Elite) can afford.

    Unemployment is down – only because he has employed them all himself.

    GDP is healthy. Take out the growth in public spending, (using borrowed money) and GDP would be the lowest of any European country.

    In short his economy benefitted in the first term from Tory economics, and in the second term from massive borrowing by the government and by the public who were using the inflated houseprices to borrow. Rememeber when money is borrowed it is borrowed from future earnings.

    I am afraid that you have read and believed the New Labour narrative, a narrative that contains the main plank of government strategy – lies.

  2. Brownie says:

    because I am in Australia I cannot assess your Charles Kennedy but in a sit-down with Bush, he could not be more stupid than Mr Nucular.

  3. sparx says:

    Oh come on Ph, I suppose the Tory party have suddenly and miraculously reformed themselves from the lying, sleazy, corrupt bunch of tossers that got kicked out on their ear 8 years ago.

    No Labour are not a huge amount better. But they are still not the 1997 Conservative Party. Which is why I am another voter rooting for a much reduced majority and a greater role for the ‘Dems. Can’t be worse than anything else we’ve tried these last 20 years or so.

  4. Citizen Sane says:

    ph – Yep, already expressed concerns about borrowing levels elsewhere and higher taxes are inevitable. But the same would be true under the Tories because their spending plans are virtually identical. I’m not following a New Labour narrative, I’m just concurring with a number of commentators who also agree that Brown has been a good chancellor: many City analysts, for example. The Financial Times for another. Oh, and The Economist magazine. To name but a few. Hardly mouthpieces for New Labour, wouldn’t you agree? Besides, the borrowing levels are far lower than that of the USA, Germany or France. Oh, and for your information, the global economy HAS slackened. It did so sometime in the latter half of the year 2000 and never returned to those levels again. The UK economy has handled itself pretty well in the meantime though.

    Additionally, the chancellor has no control over the housing market: price rises were exacerbated by low interest rates (determined by the independent MPC, whose remit is to control inflation, not the cost of property) and supply of housing in London and the south-east not meeting demand.

    But thanks for your input!

  5. Laura says:

    Game, set and match methinks!!!

    Went to vote this morning and I was the ONLY ONE THERE!!! Doesn’t bode well, does it?

  6. mAc Chaos says:

    I’ve heard that the Tories are essentially the American equivalent of the Democrats here. No substance, just hysterical claims and a pet issue.

  7. Citizen Sane says:

    Hmmmm. In that respect, maybe they are. But really, the historical links of the Tories are with the Republicans, and Labour with the Democrats. Although the Blair/Bush co-operative has changed the relationships to a certain extent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Citizen Sane
Citizen Sane
  • RT @NickCohen4: Corbyn: "I want to end austerity." Labour delegates: "But Brexit will make it worse." Corbyn: "Shut up, right now." 6 hours ago
  • @BDStanley Bring that ruckus. 14 hours ago
  • RT @DavidBowieReal: David Bowie’s "Heroes" single is forty years old today. Pull up a chair and read all about it here. It’s a long one: ht… 1 day ago
  • Ah, I see the credulous continue to seek nourishment from Jeremy Corbyn's flaccid teat. 1 day ago
  • @BDStanley That would be awful. Who would do such a thing? 1 day ago
Archives
Categories

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,305 other followers

%d bloggers like this: